I have noticed by watching these Australian films that there are some similarities among them. First of all they seem to like the F word. They
use it very fluently. Second, they do not pick "attractive" actors and
actresses, at least not by Hollywood standards. It doesn't seem much of a
priority. The parts that I enjoyed the most throughout the movie The
Man who Sewed God were the more slap stick comedy parts. For example,
the scene where the main character is drunk at the start and keeps
hitting and falling on the journalist. It was just one unfortunate
accident after another. Speaking of unfortunate accidents, the fact that
he got stuck out in a really bad storm and debris injured his foot and
sunk his boat was extremely unfortunate. Also the way the insurance
company was treating him was completely unjust. This movie is a comedy
but it has very interesting theological and social justice implications.
It sounds absurd when one hears that this man is trying to sue God but
really he is trying to show how ridiculous this policy is that the insurance companies have in place. They are using God as a way to jip
people out of money. They are abusing the name of God, so by him suing
God he isn't being blasphemes, he is calling out the misuse of God's
name. This is very much an underdog story fighting for justice, I think,
more than a comedy. It reminds me of The Castle because of the injustice
being done to the common man and then the common man sticking up for
himself. Both men were offered money settlements but both men refused
because they were fighting something bigger than what money could buy.
Also both movie climaxes happened in a courtroom. I also thought it was
funny that the bus he went on had the destination of Eden, which is a
cool biblical reference to the Garden of Eden. Also, a visual trope
throughout the movie is the sky. The shots of the sunrises, sunsets and
beautiful cloud movements. I think the reason for this is a constant
feeling of God's presence. It is a reminder that God has a part in the
situations going on. The bird bursting through the courtroom window in
slow motion was a little much for me. I understand what the film makers
were doing but it seemed a bit cheesy.
I have also noticed that the use of bad language is prevalent in these films. But to them, it is not so bad. The meanings behind some words in America may not be the same as some meanings that they have in Australia. Personally, I think the language can add to the humor at times. Meyers getting a parking ticket would not be as funny if he didn't stand there and shout profanities. I also found the story rather compelling in the way that people look at God. It begins as a man trying to make a statement about injustice, but turns into a fight over the existence of a higher power.
I really enjoyed this movie. The legal battle over the"act of God" clause takes on several perspectives. In the beginning of the film one might think that God actually saved his life because the motor on his small boat stalled. If it hadn't, he might have been on the boat when it got hit by lightning.I also appreciated the theological views the film explored. I have seen Billy Connolly in several movies and he always gives a solid performance.